Re: execve replacement.

From: Brian Gerst (bgerst@didntduck.org)
Date: Wed Oct 04 2000 - 08:32:47 EST


Abel Muņoz Alcaraz wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have replaced the execve() kernel API with my own implementation but it
> doesn't work well.

"it doesn't work well" is a bit vague...

I am guessing that you are getting an unresolved symbol. Modifying the
system call table is not and probably never will be available for
modules. The syscall table is very architecture dependant, and is not
exported to modules.

--

Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST