On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 04:39:06PM -0400, Horst von Brand <vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> wrote:
> > I wouldn't mind, either, if this didn't mean that programs compiled
> > on rehdat need redhat versions of the development toolchain / runtime
> > environment to use them :(
>
> Has happened on and off with each distribution I've ever played with. The
> point being?
That what you say is simply not true, so what's _your_ point in claiming
this?
One never needed suse's or redhat's glibc to run binaries created on their
platforms. Likewise one never needed their libstdc++ or their toolchain,
the official ones (released by the official maintainers) always were
enough.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 21:00:08 EST