Re: Bloat? (khttpd)

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:47:29 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Zach Brown: "Re: Bloat? (khttpd)"
Previous message: Adam Fritzler: "Re: ioctls for token ring (2.3.x)"

On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I believe the duty to produce numbers goes to the person trying to get
> the code included. The idea being that you have to prove the solution is useful
> w/ code and numbers before it will be included in the kernel. At least, that's
> the way I always saw it.

http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/performance.html

zeus isnt exactly a slouch.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Zach Brown: "Re: Bloat? (khttpd)"
Previous message: Adam Fritzler: "Re: ioctls for token ring (2.3.x)"