Re: Ok, making ready for pre-2.4 and code-freeze..

Tigran Aivazian (tigran@sco.COM)
Tue, 21 Dec 1999 15:49:42 +0000 (GMT)


Hi Rogier,

You said:

> The return code for unix system calls should be defined as "negative"
> for error, and not "-1".

I beg to differ because lseek(2) has the right to return negative offsets
on some implementations (of UNIX) on some architectures (notably i386).

So, if lseek(2) can do it then I'd check anything else for ret == -1 when
I write portable UNIX code.

Regards,
------
Tigran A. Aivazian | http://www.sco.com
Escalations Research Group | tel: +44-(0)1923-813796
Santa Cruz Operation Ltd | http://www.ocston.org/~tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/