>Yes, but... :) If we wait until the 2.4.x branch, our opportunity to
>"soak" this relatively major change without production impact will have
>passed us by. The last thing I want to do is add performance that
>impacts stability in, or too close to, a "stable" kernel series. I'd
The only thing that should change is the slow path of the spinlock. It's a
minor change that we can do at any time without worrying to impact
stability.
>another, and someone else is doing the LKCD, IIRC. The snowball is
>growing :)
:))
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/