> Thus spake Jason Hill
> >Is anyone currently working on adding support to 2.2.x (or for
> >2.3.x/2.4) for ISL encapsulation? This would be an incredibly useful
> >feature to the networking code.
>
> I'd rather see 802.1q than ISL. Even though I use ISL in a spot or two
> in my network...that's not long for the world...it was the only real
> option at the time...but being a Cisco proprietary thing...I'd rather
> not having developers wasting their time implementing it, and go ahead
> and do 802.1q
IIRC, 802.1q is now in almost all the Cisco switching software now, and I
wouldn't be too surprised if this fell into disuse over the next two
years.
Yes 802.1q would be where I would spend my cycles.
wfms
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/