Re: RasterMan on linux and threads
raster@rasterman.com
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 23:00:53 -0800 (PST)
On 19 Dec, Martin Dalecki scribbled:
-> raster@rasterman.com wrote:
-> >
-> > On 18 Dec, Ingo Molnar scribbled:
-> > ->
-> > -> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 raster@rasterman.com wrote:
-> > ->
-> > -> > On 17 Dec, Dan Kegel scribbled:
-> > -> > -> re http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_9912_03/msg00480.html
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > -> Rasterman is wrong in saying that all threads run on the same
-> > -> >
-> > -> > hmm - when did that change ? [...]
-> > ->
-> > -> threads/processes ran on all CPUs concurrently ever since SMP Linux
-> > -> existed.
-> >
-> > the preference weighting tries to kep themont he same cpu to some
-> > extent - ut as allan poitned out - idle pu's will be preferred over
-> > recyclign the came cpu - an that's exatly what i want... use up all he
-> > cpu's u have - esecially if they're idle.
->
-> Thank's Lord! Finally someone out there with a spelling even
-> worser then myself!!
i try hard - it takes a lot of effort :)
--
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) raster@rasterman.com raster@valinux.com
raster@enlightenment.org raster@linux.com
raster@zip.com.au
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/