Re: [PATCH] asm*/resource.h fix for glibc
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 19:38:09 -0500
In message <19991217011701.A23083@cistron.nl>, Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
+-----
| According to Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH:
| > In message <83bn5f$923$1@enterprise.cistron.net>, Miquel van Smoorenburg
| > writes:
| > | If glibc-devel has /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux-2.2.5-20/include/
| linux
| > | is there any reason not to put the 2.2.5-20 kernel headers directly
| > | into /usr/include instead of via a symlink ?
| >
| > Because some of us upgrade our kernels without going through the whole RPM
| > rigmarole and would prefer to be able to change one or two symlinks instead
| > of copying all the headers?
|
| But you don't NEED to upgrade the kernel headers in /usr/include if
| you upgrade the kernel. In fact that was the entire point of Linus'
| posting. And mine. Sigh
+--->8
When new ioctls etc. show up, we do. In particular, I'm running 2.2.13ac3
on RH5.2, so the old kernel includes (for 2.0.36) *are* wrong.
--
brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh
We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/