I want to do the same thing with code: copy the code I want into
dynamic memory on a function-by-function basis. Is there a preferred
method?
Presuming function dependencies are correct, a possible solution might
be to compile any code which might be dynamic copied with -fPIC, and
then set up the copy and call on that basis. That is somewhat messy, I
am almost surely missing a more elegant solution.
If you are wondering "why", I want to drop all support code for chipsets
which are not detected by drive probe (which is substantial in some
cases). Or in other words, have drivers re-link themselves at runtime,
freeing unwanted code :)
Though I guess __init and this sort of hackery becomes less important in
a hot-plug device world.
Thanks much,
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Just once, I wish we would encounter Building 1024 | an alien menace that wasn't immune to MandrakeSoft, Inc. | bullets. -- The Brigadier, "Dr. Who"- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/