>>> ... for values of "something" being "clueless luser with ego on
>>> steroids"
>> Frankly, in _any_ UNIX software house your lack of clue would
>> cost you job in a week (if your boss would be kind enough to
>> give you such week for reading the fscking manual, that is).
> Except that I am indepentdly wealthy and unlike most other
> folks, I don't have to "work" for someone else as a "career
> employee", in fact, I've got lots of folks working for me.
In that case, why don't you let the people you presumably employ to
write software do their job, rather than trying to do it for them.
> Now go wash out your mouth with soap .... shame shame, treating
> a fellow Linux developer so mean ....
Which "fellow Linux developer" is being treated meanly? I haven't seen
any such behaviour anywhere, least of all on Linux-Kernel.
Best wishes from Riley.
* Copyright (C) 1999, Memory Alpha Systems.
* All rights and wrongs reserved.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/