Re: Kernels do not compile anymore

david parsons (orc@pell.portland.or.us)
14 Dec 1999 02:04:23 -0800


In article <linux.kernel.199912132231.PAA25423@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>,
Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> wrote:
>Richard B. Johnson writes:
>[...]
>> So, where is the real version of the kernel?
>
>ftp.kernel.org
>
>I realise it's frustrating when development kernels don't compile.
>But, hey, they are development kernels after all. Use 2.2.x if you
>want any promises.

It's probably better to produce a patch when the kernel won't
compile, but surely it's better that when something goes belly up
and stays dead that people should complain bitterly about it instead
of just quietly shuffling off to the -ac stable branch.

____
david parsons \bi/ If people can't complain, it's stopped being a
\/ development branch but is instread a research branch.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/