Re: Possible 2.2.14pre12 bug: set_blocksize message on umount

Nate Eldredge (neldredge@hmc.edu)
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 17:59:25 -0800

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Nate Eldredge wrote:
>
> >Hope this helps in tracking down the bug. Please let me know if you
> >need any more details.
>
> Could you apply this patch over your current tree (that should be clean
> 2.2.14pre12 plus the other patch I posted recently on l-k)?

Got it. Here's the output (reformatted manually because the line breaks
in the message were messed up):

set_blocksize: b_count 1, dev ide0(3,1), block 15332, from c0143afe ,
creator c0126dae
set_blocksize: b_count 1, dev ide0(3,1), block 527162, from c0143afe,
creator c0126dae
set_blocksize: b_count 2, dev ide0(3,1), block 1191388, from c0143afe,
creator c0126dae
set_blocksize: b_count 2, dev ide0(3,1), block 1191392, from c0143afe,
creator c0126dae
set_blocksize: b_count 2, dev ide0(3,1), block 198730, from c0143afe,
creator c0126dae
set_blocksize: b_count 1, dev ide0(3,1), block 490754, from c0143afe,
creator c0126dae
set_blocksize: b_count 2, dev ide0(3,1), block 461357, from c0143afe,
creator c0126dae

Relevant /etc/System.map entries:

c0143aac T fat_put_super
c0126d94 T bread

-- 


Nate Eldredge
neldredge@hmc.edu


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/