Re: [patch] fastcall-2.3.32-B6, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT support

Peter Samuelson (peter@wire.cadcamlab.org)
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 16:59:16 -0600 (CST)


[me]
> > We are still talking ia32 only, right? Because the SPARC people
> > would *really* have fun with this sort of proposal....

[Richard Gooch]
> I don't see why it should be restricted to ia32. The technique can
> just as easily be applied to other CPUs.

If there are optimized system call paths for other archs that we might
want to make use of. This came out of the discussion of how to make
use of SYSENTER, after all.

> Why do you say the Sparc people would have fun? Is that "fun, as in
> we can do neat tricks with this", or "fun, as in break out the
> flamethrowers"?

I was thinking that building the jump table on sparc{,64} would be
complex because of their sparse syscall numbers. On second thought
this wouldn't necessarily be the case.

But that brings up an interesting side issue: are we considering
multiple PER_* or just PER_LINUX?

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/