Re: Windows 9x and RFC1323

Jeffrey B. Siegal (jbs@quiotix.com)
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 03:13:51 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jim Gettys: "Re: TCP alwayskeepalive option."
Previous message: Jim Gettys: "Re: Per-Processor Data Page"
Maybe in reply to: Marek Habersack: "Windows 9x and RFC1323"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Windows 9x and RFC1323"

"David S. Miller" wrote:
> And the fact that absolutely _nobody_ has provided any tcpdump
> traces of failed or misbehaving connections keeps me from even
> knowing if SACK is really the core problem. I can't even know
> whether Linux is the real culprit or not without this debugging
> information.

Now that I can reliably control whether the problem occurs, I will try to
generate some tcpdump traces.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jim Gettys: "Re: TCP alwayskeepalive option."
Previous message: Jim Gettys: "Re: Per-Processor Data Page"
Maybe in reply to: Marek Habersack: "Windows 9x and RFC1323"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Windows 9x and RFC1323"