Re: timer_bh behaviour incorrect for 2.2.13?

William Montgomery (william@opinicus.com)
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 13:41:58 -0500 (EST)

I am having a difficult time with the patch to run_bottom_halves.
I have the following:
bh = bh_base;
while ((active = get_active_bhs())) {
__sti();
clear_active_bhs(active);
do {
if (active & 1)
(*bh)();
bh++;
active >>= 1;
} while (active);
__cli();
}

I left the __sti(); / __cli(); in the caller.
On boot up I get an Oops and Aiee killing interrupt handler.

What did I screw up?

Wm

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/