Re: timer_bh behaviour incorrect for 2.2.13?

Benjamin C.R. LaHaise (blah@kvack.org)
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 12:54:10 -0500 (EST)


On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> this is impossible if we do hardirq_endlock()+softirq_endlock() with local
> IRQs disabled [like my second quick-patch did] ... No need to add
> additional expensive spinlocks, bottom-half performance sucks anyway.