Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?
Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Wed, 8 Dec 1999 11:29:32 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Seems, you meaned multipath. teql is another beast and it is
> > exactly, which is reauired in this case. Usage is trivial
> > and described in two lines in net/sched/sch_teql.c
> Excellent. So we can shoot eql.c for 2.4 ? (please...) and get rid of all
> the crufty master/slave stuff it has
There are also other reasons to kill eql - its buggy, and doesnt look like
the bugs will ever get fixed at this point. It should definitely die now
that there are better generic alternatives
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/