Re: [patch] new spinlock variant, spinlock-2.3.30-A4

Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Tue, 7 Dec 1999 11:16:27 +0100 (CET)


On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Manfred wrote:

> Ingo, do your new spin_lock() functions clobber any registers? This
> would further increase the costs in "real life".

which one do you mean? The 'LOCK-less' does, but i included those costs in
the 15 cycles number. [such spinlocks would not be inlined] The 'decl' one
[for which i've sent the patch] doesnt clobber any register.

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/