Re: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Tue, 7 Dec 1999 00:38:07 +0100 (CET)


>On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
>> For the ret to userspace case it could decrease a bit the bh latency
^^

whoops I meant irq latency there.

>> but it seems not a big issue, as right now a ret from syscall will act
>> like while returning from an irq after the bottom half path.
>
>bh latency is important in some cases, and often we do not return to
>userspace for millisecs (tens of millisecs in other cases). This might
>even explain some of the TCP oddities.

Yes, agreed.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/