Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 12:35:33 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: PATCH for 2.3.29: block device setup cleanup."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: PATCH for 2.3.29: block device setup cleanup."
In reply to: Alessandro Sala: "PROBLEM: Asynchronous I/O with realtime signals erroneously sends SIGIO"

On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Alexandre Hautequest wrote:
> > > Anyone's here still use this thing?
> > AFAIK EQL is dead and you should use the teql queue instead.
> teql isnt useful on low bandwidth links where you really want to do per
> packet routing with queue length based balancers

In this case isnt MPP better? Someone was supposed to be adding multilink
support for pppd but this project seems to have fallen into disrepair.

I had big problems with device starvation under EQL last time I used it,
one device would get 80% of the traffic and the other would get maybe 20%.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: PATCH for 2.3.29: block device setup cleanup."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: PATCH for 2.3.29: block device setup cleanup."
In reply to: Alessandro Sala: "PROBLEM: Asynchronous I/O with realtime signals erroneously sends SIGIO"