Re: [patch] quick aic7xxx compile fix

Drew Bertola (drew@drewb.com)
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 18:19:43 +0000 ()


The difference was in the second argument. It was "aix..." but should
be "aic..." (or to make it more clear, it was "..x7xxx" but should be
"..c7xxx". Tough to spot.

D->|

Frank Bernard writes:
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't see any difference.
> Instead, I've removed the second superfluos parameter NULL in the call
> at line 9086. What's right ?
>
> On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>
> > -__setup("aic7xxx=", aix7xxx_setup);
> > +__setup("aic7xxx=", aic7xxx_setup);
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / kind regards
>
> Frank Bernard
>
>
> Frank Bernard Informationstechnik GmbH
> vanity +49 700 FIREWALL (0700 FIREWALL) phone : +49 69 477169
> Dipl.-Inform. Frank Bernard fax : +49 69 47885616
> Wehrheimerstr. 9 email : fb@fbit.de
> 60389 Frankfurt www : http://www.fbit.de
> Germany http://www.linuxwall.de
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

D->|

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/