>> I thought I was being pretty conservative by waiting till 2.2.13
>> before upgrading. But it seems not quite conservative enough. I
>> guess that not too many people use the transparent proxy
>> functionality.
> It certainly seems to be little used. It did actually work in
> some earlier 2.2 releases but nobody noticed it broke when the
> socket hashes changed
Is that likely to be fixed anytime soon? I've just accepted a system
for configuring under RedHat 6.1 that is to be used as a combined
firewalled gateway with transparent proxy implemented, so this is
definately bad news for me !!!
Alternatively, which STABLE kernel can I use where it works and there
aren't any bugs I can't work round?
Best wishes from Riley.
* Copyright (C) 1999, Memory Alpha Systems.
* All rights and wrongs reserved.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/