Re: How to get around sb sound dependency?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sat, 4 Dec 1999 14:06:37 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] new spinlock variant, spinlock-2.3.30-A4"
Previous message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: Oops with ext3 journaling"

> What's the best way to work around this? (output below) Separate sb
> core functions from generic sb driver?

That may be a good longer term approach. Right now you can however load
the sb module with "support=1" and it will not probe. Its broken in 2.3.30pre
because whoever added the isapnp supprot got it wrong.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] new spinlock variant, spinlock-2.3.30-A4"
Previous message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: Oops with ext3 journaling"