Yes. Thats one reason I've not done it.
> code and you'll understand), plus one structure (ppp_device) will probably
> not be necessary anymore (which means changing the interface with drivers)
> ... Of course, I might be mistaken (actually, I _hope_ I am !! :).
the syncppp needs a dev pointer. Most of the rest seems ok as it extracts the
syncppp object from the device. Some of it gets ugly as you need to
use dev->priv for the syncppp which means you need drivers to use something
else.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/