> Note btw its not enough to specify if its been tested with 2.2.5 or 2.2.12
> you also have to specify if it is egcs or gcc built. for 1 or 2gig memory
> option and/or for SMP
Yuck. I did not realize it was this bad. I knew about the SMP dependency,
but not the others.
Something I have wondered about for a while is how difficult would it be to
make SMP modules run in a non-SMP kernel. Is it as easy as having the UP
kernels provide dummy locking functions which always say they aquired a lock
but dont really try?
Thanks,
Jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/