Re: dual pIII network / lockup problems

Miquel van Smoorenburg (miquels@cistron.nl)
25 Nov 1999 18:21:20 +0100

In article <cistron.Pine.LNX.4.10.KSI2mu3.9911251823320.26132-100000@nomad.ksi-linux.com>,
Sergey Kubushin <ksi@ksi-linux.com> wrote:
>BTW, is the stable kernel > 2.2.0 supposed to appear at all? Which does
>build outta the box with full options enabled? And which does not contain
>unresolved symbols in modules? And which does really work? The last stable
>kernel which I did see was 2.1.125... It still runs on one of our primary
>NS'es with several thousands zones:

We run 2.2.x kernels on several SMP boxes and uniprocessor boxes,
including 4-way SMP Xeon ones. After we chased all the buggy
hardware down (esp. RAM) they run fine. For example:

% uname -a
Linux beast 2.2.13 #6 SMP Sat Oct 23 11:29:25 CEST 1999 i686 unknown
% uptime
6:18pm up 28 days, 7:42, 3 users, load average: 3.75, 3.73, 3.73
% cat /proc/cpuinfo | egrep '(processor|model name)'
processor : 0
model name : Pentium III (Katmai)
processor : 1
model name : Pentium III (Katmai)
processor : 2
model name : Pentium III (Katmai)
processor : 3
model name : Pentium III (Katmai)

Mike.

-- 
First things first, but not necessarily in that order.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/