Re: 2.3.29: ramdisk still broken.

Mike Galbraith (mikeg@weiden.de)
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 17:15:56 +0100 (CET)


On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > The way I see it, the ramdisk used to work by making it's data persistent
> > in the buffer cache. Today, data doesn't live in the buffer cache, it
> > lives in the page cache. Ergo, the task at hand is to figure out how
> > to make data in the page cache persistent rather than copying that data
> > back and forth.
>
> Another view of the situation may be - ramdisk used to be static but then
> started to rely on buffer cache. Now it can no longer rely on buffer
> cache. Therefore, shouldn't it go back to being static?

I did that before trying anything else.. took it out of buffer cache
all together and used vmalloc instead. Made for a pretty slow ramdisk.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/