Re: Module-based setup vs. monolithic kernel

Tuukka Toivonen (tuukkat@ees2.oulu.fi)
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 00:51:05 +0200 (EET)


On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Jason A. Diegmueller wrote:

>What are the advantages vs. disadvantages of going with either a
>modular-based setup vs. a monolithic kernel with all necessary options
>built in?

The only bad thing in modular drivers is, AFAIK, that each module
allocates integer number of pages. Ie. you lose an average of pagesize/2
bytes of memory when you load a module, instead of having the driver
compiled into kernel. On PC this is 4kB/2 = 2kB.

Correct me if I'm wrong =)

--
| Tuukka Toivonen <tuukkat@ee.oulu.fi>       [PGP public key
| Homepage: http://www.ee.oulu.fi/~tuukkat/       available]
| Try also finger -l tuukkat@ee.oulu.fi
| Studying information engineering at the University of Oulu
+-----------------------------------------------------------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/