Re: Bit errors in 2.3.>=26

Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:41:11 +0100


Pavel Machek wrote:
> So my questions are:
> does someone have 2.3.2[68] which can at least compile kernel?

I've compiled the kernel several times with 2.3.26 and it seems fine. I
haven't noticed any bit errors. I've been using 2.3.26 since Nov 7.

Might you have better luck with mem=NM where N = your machine's
megabytes minus one? I use mem=63M. Without it, 2.3.25 crashes and I
haven't removed it since.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/