> On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
> > Otherwise, what you are describing is a well known problem with the
> > way Apache listens for new requests and is being addressed. You are
> > right that it requires support from the kernel and Apache at the same
> > time though.
>
> there is no problem at all with Apache. Wake-one does not need any
> application-side change, this is a common misconception. [Apache does
> provide an optimization to avoid OS-level accept() inefficiencies, but
> that is a different issue and it can be turned on/off freely.] The
> wake-one implementation in 2.3 works automatically and works just fine.
And the status of the implementation in 2.2 would be.....? (pick one)
A. Already in it.
B. Not going to be in it.
C. Going to be backported.
D. None of the above.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/