Re: Data loss on NFS mounted directory (2.2.13)

Trond Myklebust (trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no)
Fri, 5 Nov 1999 18:37:39 +0100 (CET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: (no name): "(no subject)"
Previous message: David Mansfield: "LOTS OF BAD STUFF in raid0: raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 is unstable"

>>>>> " " == Jens Benecke <jens@pinguin.conetix.de> writes:

> (StarOffice/so51a_os2_49.exe, status=0 flags=0) NFS: 3152
> nfs_wback_result (StarOffice/so51a_os2_49.exe, status=-116,

The above is the result from the first writeback after the rename
operation: status=-116 which is indeed '-ESTALE'.

As I said earlier: this is really a server bug. A cross-directory
rename should not cause the old filehandle to be declared stale.

Cheers,
Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: (no name): "(no subject)"
Previous message: David Mansfield: "LOTS OF BAD STUFF in raid0: raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 is unstable"