Yes. But lots of folks are still using it (including me) because it's
stable as a rock. 2.2 is almost there from a maturation standpoint.
It's had a lot of good soak time. We always try to support everything
that's out there within a four year window, so that's why we will still
support it.
Jeff
Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey <jmerkey@timpanogas.com> writes:
>
> Jeff> Stephen,
>
> Jeff> This is only supported on the newer kernels. Older Linux
> Jeff> (2.0.38) does not support a general purpose interface, or
> Jeff> support the callback. This means that we will need to support
> Jeff> multiple methods of doing this I/O to cover all Linux versions.
> Jeff> It appears we will be synchronous on 2.0.38 and older Linux.
> Jeff> This is assuming I can find a way to get around the fact that
> Jeff> all of the functions needing to be called are not declared
> Jeff> "static" as they are today.
>
> Excuse me, but this is like complaining about Solaris 2.3 and Solaris
> 2.6 being different internally. Linux 2.0.x is almost 3 years old.
>
> Jes
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/