Re: {interruptible_,}sleep_on question

Leonard N. Zubkoff (lnz@dandelion.com)
Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:14:08 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: vfork"
Previous message: Philip Blundell: "Re: vfork"
Maybe in reply to: Manfred Spraul: "{interruptible_,}sleep_on question"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: {interruptible_,}sleep_on question"

Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 17:44:14 +0000 (GMT)
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

I think the DAC960 is holding the io_request_lock and its own spinlocks
appropriately. I may be wrong here.

I certainly believe it is. The DAC960 driver drops io_request_lock before
calling sleep_on.

Leonard

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: vfork"
Previous message: Philip Blundell: "Re: vfork"
Maybe in reply to: Manfred Spraul: "{interruptible_,}sleep_on question"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: {interruptible_,}sleep_on question"