Re: A small bug with CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

Michael Elizabeth Chastain (mec@shout.net)
Wed, 20 Oct 1999 12:32:19 -0500

> The reasoning looks correct to me, and I just used fgrep to analyse
> the entire 2.3.22 tree, with the ones you pointed out being the only
> naked ones I came across.

Thanks Riley.

> - if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" != "n" ]; then
> + if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then

All the interpreters have been fixed so that they handle != "n" properly
(this was non-trivial because variables have the empty value "" if they
are not initialized). So these constructions are OK.

Michael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/