Re: HFS, QNXFS
Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 15 Oct 1999 13:58:40 +0100 (BST)
> > Both HFS and QNXFS has been in the kernel for quite some time, yet both
> > are flagged Experimental.
> >
> > Is this still the case? Are they considered more unstable than other
> > filesystems in the kernel? If they are considered unstable, HFS should
> > be made if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" ] ...
>
> I've used both and yes they are both still buggy and should remain marked
> as such. Is anybody still actively maintaining them?
HFS has a maintaier and seems pretty much rock solid in 2.2. The QNXfs is
still very experimental. Its a read only "solves the migration from QNX
to Linux" file system - no more.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/