Re: [PATCH] Slightly safer Magic SysRq

Guest section DW (dwguest@win.tue.nl)
Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:06:05 +0200 (MET DST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] scheduler cleanup"
Previous message: Rogier Wolff: "SMP overhead."
Maybe in reply to: Ed Grimm: "[PATCH] Slightly safer Magic SysRq"
Next in thread: Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Slightly safer Magic SysRq"

> +Safe Magic System Request Key support
> +CONFIG_SAFE_MAGIC_SYSRQ
> + If you say Y here, alt-SysRq-l will behave the same as alt-SysRq-i,

Such things lead to a proliferation of CONFIG options.
SYSRQ is already a very unimportant auxiliary option -
I don't think it is a good idea to start offering this option
in various subversions.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] scheduler cleanup"
Previous message: Rogier Wolff: "SMP overhead."
Maybe in reply to: Ed Grimm: "[PATCH] Slightly safer Magic SysRq"
Next in thread: Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Slightly safer Magic SysRq"