Re: SMP process/processor binding

Tim Hockin (thockin@isunix.it.ilstu.edu)
Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:41:06 -0500 (CDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH] parport_pc fix for 2.3.21"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Advice wanted: WebFS term project"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: SMP process/processor binding"

> > > Rather than posting the diffs here, they're available from the following
> > > URL: http://teddy.xylene.com/smp-2.2.10.tar.gz
> > > There's also a similar one for 2.0.37 (smp-2.0.37.tar.gz).
> > >
> > > If there's any significant interest in this, I'll move it along to
> > > 2.3.19 (latest ?).
> >
> > Yes, absolutely.
> > Does this also extend itself to the thread level ?
>
> In Linux a thread is a process so yes. There is btw an established API +
> some patches using it. The sysmp() interface is something a lot of big
> cluster and SMP apps already handle as its used by SGI

just to follow up on sysmp - http://isunix.it.ilstu.edu/~thockin/pset is
the source for it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH] parport_pc fix for 2.3.21"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Advice wanted: WebFS term project"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: SMP process/processor binding"