Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB device allocation

Scott Henry (scotth@sgi.com)
08 Oct 1999 19:01:06 -0700


>>>>> "T" == Theodore Y Ts'o <tytso@MIT.EDU> writes:

T> However, even if you use this type of approach for /devfs, it's still a
T> cumbersome interface. Consider that with a /proc/devices-style
T> approach, a one or two read()'s will allow you to get all of the
T> information you need.

T> With a /devfs approach, you will still need to readdir() through all of
T> /devfs, figure out what changed, and then stat the device to see what
T> has differed.

The current devfs patches have a special device file (/dev/.devfsd)
for devfsd to listen to for changes. It doesn't have to scan the
/dev directory for _that_ reason. At least that's what the docs say--
I haven't looked at the code.

-- 
 Scott Henry <scotth@sgi.com> /  Help! My disclaimer is missing!
 IRIX MTS,                   /  GIGO *really* means: Garbage in, Gospel Out
 Silicon Graphics, Inc      /  http://reality.sgi.com/scotth/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/