Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)
Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Im a devfs advocate but I agree the symlink design is bad.
> > Would an overmountable devfs address most of the arguments against it?
> Not sure... Could you elaborate on what you mean by 'overmountable'?
I guess the better term is "Union fs".
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/