Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a

M Carling (m@idiom.com)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 05:20:24 -0700 (PDT)

David Parsons wrote:
> Well, the best way to fix the implementation would then be to
> include it in 2.3.x and let the legion of kernel hackers fix the
> problems with it.

While I'm not sure there is really anything about devfs that needs fixing,
if there is then surely it can and should be fixed before including it in
the kernel.

Also, it is too late for 2.3.x, which is now feature frozen. If devfs
needs to be fixed, start fixing it now and then submit it against 2.5.0
next year.

M Carling

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/