Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device alloc

David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Fri, 08 Oct 1999 08:22:07 -0100


Horst von Brand wrote:

> Shawn Leas <SLEAS@videoupdate.com> said:
> > So, you complain and moan about devfs.... So, I publically challenge you
> > to tell me what complexity devfs adds to the kernel if you de-configure
> > it when compiling? It turns into NOTHING!!!
>
> False. It stays in the source, developers have to take it into account,
> device drivers will have to be written both ways (devfs and not), ...

generally i think you overstate the impact of this.

throughout the code, most of the impact is likened to the following:

register_device(...)
becomes
devfs_register_device(...)

if you really want to get antsy about it, it's pretty easy to make a teeny little
macro that does the appropriate magics.

-d

--
 This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows NT reboot!
  Do you remember how to -think- ? Do you remember how to experiment? Linux
__ is an operating system that brings back the fun and adventure in computing.
\/  for linux-kernel: please read linux/Documentation/* before posting problems

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/