RE: Cosmetic bugs? (msg irrellevant)

Jones D (djones2@glam.ac.uk)
Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:20:41 +0100


> > Trapping all these cases to panic and
> > explain why would probably be not worth the space that they
> would take up,

> Please note that these two functions are __init functions, I think in
> these your reason doesn't apply

True, but I was speaking as a general case as in most of the list that I
pointed out..

> > as they really are 99.9% impossible to hit. (Or at least should be).
> Sorry my poor english, do you want to mean "impossible to
> recover from"?

No, I meant that the code really should "never fail" (famous last words?)

regards,

Dave.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/