Re: [patch] __lock_sock race condition in 2.3.18*

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:52:22 +0200 (CEST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: kernel-hacking-HOWTO: An lk primer seeks feedback"
Previous message: Scott Henry: "Re: 1000ms delay in networking stack or driver, new bug?"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: Out of Memory, filesystem corruption problems on 2.2.11: EATA"

On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, David S. Miller wrote:

>The other cpu will dirty the cache line by obtaining the spinlock.

I see your point now and make sense. I never thought at cache issues while
playing with spinlocks. I'll take this in mind. Thanks.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: kernel-hacking-HOWTO: An lk primer seeks feedback"
Previous message: Scott Henry: "Re: 1000ms delay in networking stack or driver, new bug?"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: Out of Memory, filesystem corruption problems on 2.2.11: EATA"