Re: pgcc

Rogier Wolff (linux@locutus.mandrakesoft.de)
Fri, 17 Sep 1999 20:13:57 +0200 (CEST)


On 9 Sep 1999, Oystein Viggen wrote:

> Simple question:
> Would compiling the kernel with pgcc be a Bad Move(TM)?

If you're using a recent kernel (> 2.1.something), it will work.

> Would it work at all, and if so, would it run faster than with gcc/egcs?

If you set the right optimization flags in Makefile and
arch/i386/Makefile, you can get quite a speed increase...

You might want to look at gcc 2.95.1 as well - it includes several of
pgcc's optimizations (including k5/k6 stuff), and in some situations
outperforms pgcc 1.1.x.
I'd recommend against using pgcc 2.95.something for now - there are too
many bugs in it.

LLaP
bero

-- 
Tired of waiting for Windows 2000?
	STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/