Re: update --> kupdate ?

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 18:42:51 +0200 (CEST)


On 10 Sep 1999, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote:

>What about 2.3.x?

Will happen there too some time soon. on 2.3.x make still more sense
since it will also avoid to flush the current active_mm just to run
a schedule().

>Where can I find some info on this?

On this list... and in the sources 8).

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/