Yes. Otherwise the socket queueing will get confused by the large amounts
of free space queued.
> What do you consider as small?
The tulip uses 100 bytes
> And what do you think about my driver-specific bh routine idiea?
Its more overhead than it will save I think, even on uclinux
> the ICMP echo packet comes back usially in 0.4 ms.... so it seems that the
> small packets are stuck somewhere
> between my driver and ping application for variable amount of time....
> With packets >128 bytes there is NO problem....
> the kernel is 2.0.33 based...
Or stuck in your driver ?
> ... while talking to lightning.swansea.uk.linux.org.:
> >>> RCPT To:<alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> <<< 550-Open relay - see http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=194.98.0.128
> <<< 550 rejected: administrative prohibition
> 550 <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>... User unknown
>
> so i could not reply to you directly
My address is correct. Your mail is going via a known open mail relay. I run
aggressive spamfiltering. If that is your box check the URL it gives, this
will tell you if its your box that is the relay, what it relayed via, let
you test if you fixed relaying and the like.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/