Re: Should this list be split between RELEASE and DEVELOPMENT??

Dancer (dancer@zeor.simegen.com)
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:13:21 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Yves Lange: "Oops with SMP Kenel on Dual PIII"
Previous message: Ben McCann: "Should this list be split between RELEASE and DEVELOPMENT??"
Maybe in reply to: Ben McCann: "Should this list be split between RELEASE and DEVELOPMENT??"

Ben McCann wrote:
> should we take time to reorganize
> the mailing list?
>
> I would personally like two lists, one for released kernel (2.0, 2.2) issues
> and another for developmemt kernels (2.3, etc).
> For example, 'linux-kernel-rel' and 'linux-kernel-dev'.

Concur

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Yves Lange: "Oops with SMP Kenel on Dual PIII"
Previous message: Ben McCann: "Should this list be split between RELEASE and DEVELOPMENT??"
Maybe in reply to: Ben McCann: "Should this list be split between RELEASE and DEVELOPMENT??"