Re: Linux 2.2.12pre

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:06:26 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Segmentation fault causes stuck-in-D-state?"
Previous message: Dave DeMaagd: "Re: Threads in linux."

> No. I strongly vote to remove raid-0.90 from 2.2.12 again, because it
> breaks user space semantics so heavily. Not only the formats are
> incompatible (or so it seems), the user space tools were renamed, too.
> So I do not only have to fix the raid arrays themselves, but also the
> init-scripts.

The newer tools have been out for ages, and vendors were asked long ago
to use the newer toolset.

> Save this change for 2.4!

I've submitted Linus a final diff containing these changes. I'd prefer he
made the final decision.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Segmentation fault causes stuck-in-D-state?"
Previous message: Dave DeMaagd: "Re: Threads in linux."