Re: 2.2.11: Complicated memory leak...

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:43:22 +0200 (CEST)


On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Mike Galbraith wrote:

>If you do decide to try ikd, and use gcc-2.95 (or ~recent snapshot),
>you will need the below incremental patch.

Thanks for the patch. It wasn't needed for us since the caller is
implemented in asm, but in general the caller need to know when an extern
function is going to remove the parameter from the stack himself.

Which is the exact complain from the compiler? Does it break the
compilation complaining about two different declaration of the function?

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/