>>> Additionally, I have seen and am using PF_KEY=15 (RFC2367).
>>> Currently, our PF_KEYv2 is part of the 'ipsec' module, but
>>> should be separated at some point into 'key' since it is a
>>> generic keying interface.
>> I deliberately omitted that one as it appears to have at least
>> three different names in the kernel sources, and I didn't plan
>> on guessing which was the correct one.
> Good, so at least you have seen them.
Yep.
> The ones I have seen are AF_KEY, pseudo_AF_KEY, presumably
> because according to RFC2367, it should not be assumed that
> AF_KEY even exists.
The ones I've seen are AF_KEY, pseudo_AF_KEY and PseudoKEY which
presumably all refer to the same thing, but only one can be correct...
Best wishes from Riley.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
* http://www.MemAlpha.cx/kernel.versions.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/